Humanverse

Maddison vs Madilynn

American parents have registered 24,116 Maddisons since 1880, against 11,432 Madilynns. Maddison is still ahead, with 703 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Maddison against Madilynn, 1880 to 2025 0 300 600 900 1.2k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Maddison Madilynn

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Maddison has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1985 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.

The closest they came was 2021, when Maddison had 593 and Madilynn had 583.

Side by side

  Maddison Madilynn
Total US births 24,11611,432
Most in one year 1,167656
Babies in 2025 703315
Estimated living today 24,00011,000
Median age today 1411
Peak year 20092014
Best rank 281st girls479th girls
Rank in 2025 438th859th
First recorded 19851987
Girls / boys 24,063 / 5311,432 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Maddisons alive today are over 14; half the Madilynns are over 11. That is 3 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Maddison and Madilynn.