Maude vs Maurkice
American parents have registered 45,887 Maudes since 1880, against 13 Maurkices. Maude is still ahead, with 46 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Maude Maurkice
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 146 years in which either name was published, Maude for 145 years and Maurkice for 1 year. The lead changed hands 2 times.
Side by side
| Maude | Maurkice | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 45,887 | 13 |
| Most in one year | 1,406 | 13 |
| Babies in 2025 | 46 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 2,700 | 13 |
| Median age today | 72 | 14 |
| Peak year | 1888 | 2011 |
| Best rank | 32nd girls | 6,256th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 3,342nd | unranked |
| First recorded | 1880 | 2011 |
| Girls / boys | 45,754 / 133 | 0 / 13 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Maudes alive today are over 72; half the Maurkices are over 14. That is 58 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Maude and Maurkice.