Humanverse

Melanny vs Melba

American parents have registered 34,925 Melbas since 1880, against 981 Melannys. But in 2025 it was Melanny that was commoner, 27 babies to 7.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Melanny against Melba, 1880 to 2025 0 300 600 900 1.2k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Melanny Melba

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 133 years in which either name was published, Melba for 106 years and Melanny for 27 years. The lead changed hands 3 times.

Side by side

  Melanny Melba
Total US births 98134,925
Most in one year 691,003
Babies in 2025 277
Estimated living today 97011,000
Median age today 1275
Peak year 20131924
Best rank 2,568th girls202nd girls
Rank in 2025 4,878th11,932nd
First recorded 19971893
Girls / boys 981 / 034,873 / 52

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Melbas alive today are over 75; half the Melannys are over 12. That is 63 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Melanny and Melba.