Minda vs Minna
American parents have registered 3,151 Minnas since 1880, against 1,600 Mindas. Minna is still ahead, with 29 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Minda Minna
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 146 years in which either name was published, Minna for 109 years and Minda for 37 years. The lead changed hands 6 times.
Side by side
| Minda | Minna | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 1,600 | 3,151 |
| Most in one year | 38 | 54 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 29 |
| Estimated living today | 1,100 | 1,400 |
| Median age today | 54 | 26 |
| Peak year | 1951 | 1916 |
| Best rank | 1,528th girls | 928th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 4,661st |
| First recorded | 1880 | 1880 |
| Girls / boys | 1,600 / 0 | 3,151 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Mindas alive today are over 54; half the Minnas are over 26. That is 28 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Minda and Minna.