Miriam vs Mirla
American parents have registered 118,190 Miriams since 1880, against 54 Mirlas. Miriam is still ahead, with 1,262 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Miriam Mirla
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Miriam has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1880 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1907, when Miriam had 301 and Mirla had 9.
Side by side
| Miriam | Mirla | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 118,190 | 54 |
| Most in one year | 1,834 | 9 |
| Babies in 2025 | 1,262 | 5 |
| Estimated living today | 74,000 | 40 |
| Median age today | 33 | 39 |
| Peak year | 1924 | 1907 |
| Best rank | 143rd girls | 1,384th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 246th | 14,942nd |
| First recorded | 1880 | 1907 |
| Girls / boys | 117,910 / 280 | 54 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Mirlas alive today are over 39; half the Miriams are over 33. That is 6 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Miriam and Mirla.