Misk vs Mistie
American parents have registered 2,240 Misties since 1880, against 577 Misks. But in 2025 it was Misk that was commoner, 115 babies to fewer than five.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Misk Mistie
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 62 years in which either name was published, Mistie for 46 years and Misk for 16 years. The lead changed hands once.
Side by side
| Misk | Mistie | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 577 | 2,240 |
| Most in one year | 115 | 142 |
| Babies in 2025 | 115 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 570 | 2,100 |
| Median age today | 2 | 47 |
| Peak year | 2025 | 1975 |
| Best rank | 1,758th girls | 915th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 1,758th | unranked |
| First recorded | 2010 | 1960 |
| Girls / boys | 577 / 0 | 2,240 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Misties alive today are over 47; half the Misks are over 2. That is 45 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Misk Texas (3.4×), New Jersey (3.0×), Illinois (2.5×)
- Mistie Oklahoma (5.6×), Texas (4.6×), Utah (4.5×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Misk and Mistie.