Missy vs Mistie
American parents have registered 5,776 Missys since 1880, against 2,240 Misties. Missy is still ahead, with 21 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Missy Mistie
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 82 years in which either name was published, Missy for 69 years and Mistie for 13 years. The lead changed hands 12 times.
8 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.
Side by side
| Missy | Mistie | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 5,776 | 2,240 |
| Most in one year | 303 | 142 |
| Babies in 2025 | 21 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 5,300 | 2,100 |
| Median age today | 55 | 47 |
| Peak year | 1967 | 1975 |
| Best rank | 540th girls | 915th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 5,722nd | unranked |
| First recorded | 1943 | 1960 |
| Girls / boys | 5,776 / 0 | 2,240 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Missys alive today are over 55; half the Misties are over 47. That is 8 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Missy Kentucky (2.8×), Tennessee (2.7×), Ohio (2.4×)
- Mistie Oklahoma (5.6×), Texas (4.6×), Utah (4.5×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Missy and Mistie.