Monserrath vs Monte
American parents have registered 23,988 Montes since 1880, against 1,296 Monserraths. Monte is still ahead, with 121 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Monserrath Monte
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 135 years in which either name was published, Monte for 134 years and Monserrath for 1 year. The lead changed hands 2 times.
- 1881–2004 Monte ahead
- 2005 Monserrath ahead
- 2006–2025 Monte ahead
Side by side
| Monserrath | Monte | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 1,296 | 23,988 |
| Most in one year | 79 | 634 |
| Babies in 2025 | 36 | 121 |
| Estimated living today | 1,300 | 17,000 |
| Median age today | 16 | 59 |
| Peak year | 2005 | 1956 |
| Best rank | 2,278th girls | 296th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 3,975th | 1,466th |
| First recorded | 1990 | 1881 |
| Girls / boys | 1,296 / 0 | 828 / 23,160 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Montes alive today are over 59; half the Monserraths are over 16. That is 43 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Monserrath Texas (5.7×), California (4.7×), Illinois (1.1×)
- Monte North Dakota (6.3×), Idaho (6.1×), South Dakota (5.5×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Monserrath and Monte.