Naja vs Najee
American parents have registered 3,172 Najees since 1880, against 1,281 Najas. Najee is still ahead, with 17 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Naja Najee
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 56 years in which either name was published, Najee for 39 years and Naja for 17 years. The lead changed hands once.
Side by side
| Naja | Najee | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 1,281 | 3,172 |
| Most in one year | 150 | 245 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 17 |
| Estimated living today | 1,300 | 3,100 |
| Median age today | 27 | 28 |
| Peak year | 1998 | 1993 |
| Best rank | 1,219th girls | 704th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 5,399th |
| First recorded | 1964 | 1977 |
| Girls / boys | 1,275 / 6 | 417 / 2,755 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Where each one is strongest
- Naja Pennsylvania (3.4×), New York (3.1×), New Jersey (2.5×)
- Najee New Jersey (8.6×), New York (3.2×), Pennsylvania (2.1×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Naja and Najee.