Humanverse

Nara vs Narda

American parents have registered 1,069 Naras since 1880, against 656 Nardas. Nara is still ahead, with 72 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Nara against Narda, 1880 to 2025 0 20 40 60 80 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Nara Narda

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 89 years in which either name was published, Nara for 48 years and Narda for 41 years. The lead changed hands 14 times.

8 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Nara Narda
Total US births 1,069656
Most in one year 7232
Babies in 2025 72under 5
Estimated living today 1,000550
Median age today 1062
Peak year 20241961
Best rank 2,491st girls2,070th girls
Rank in 2025 2,458thunranked
First recorded 19091937
Girls / boys 1,052 / 17656 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Nardas alive today are over 62; half the Naras are over 10. That is 52 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Nara and Narda.