Olive vs Olivianna
American parents have registered 67,320 Olives since 1880, against 288 Oliviannas. Olive is still ahead, with 1,604 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Olive Olivianna
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Olive has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1880 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 2010, when Olive had 546 and Olivianna had 13.
Side by side
| Olive | Olivianna | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 67,320 | 288 |
| Most in one year | 1,841 | 32 |
| Babies in 2025 | 1,604 | 11 |
| Estimated living today | 25,000 | 290 |
| Median age today | 7 | 7 |
| Peak year | 2022 | 2019 |
| Best rank | 158th girls | 4,343rd girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 197th | 8,860th |
| First recorded | 1880 | 2007 |
| Girls / boys | 66,926 / 394 | 288 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Olive and Olivianna.