Osmar vs Osmond
American parents have registered 2,304 Osmars since 1880, against 470 Osmonds. Osmar is still ahead, with 59 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Osmar Osmond
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 75 years in which either name was published, Osmar for 47 years and Osmond for 28 years. The lead changed hands 7 times.
Side by side
| Osmar | Osmond | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 2,304 | 470 |
| Most in one year | 133 | 19 |
| Babies in 2025 | 59 | 13 |
| Estimated living today | 2,300 | 310 |
| Median age today | 16 | 17 |
| Peak year | 2008 | 2022 |
| Best rank | 1,303rd boys | 5,019th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 2,332nd | 6,446th |
| First recorded | 1973 | 1912 |
| Girls / boys | 0 / 2,304 | 0 / 470 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Osmar and Osmond.