Humanverse

Pace vs Pacey

American parents have registered 1,032 Paceys since 1880, against 981 Paces. But in 2025 it was Pace that was commoner, 42 babies to 30.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Pace against Pacey, 1880 to 2025 0 20 40 60 80 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Pace Pacey

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 44 years in which either name was published, Pace for 29 years and Pacey for 15 years. The lead changed hands 2 times.

Side by side

  Pace Pacey
Total US births 9811,032
Most in one year 5267
Babies in 2025 4230
Estimated living today 9601,000
Median age today 1115
Peak year 20242001
Best rank 2,559th boys2,027th boys
Rank in 2025 3,240th4,539th
First recorded 19171998
Girls / boys 64 / 917314 / 718

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Paceys alive today are over 15; half the Paces are over 11. That is 4 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Pace Pacey
England and Wales 3196

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Pace and Pacey.