Humanverse

Percilla vs Perla

American parents have registered 20,836 Perlas since 1880, against 567 Percillas. Perla is still ahead, with 132 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Percilla against Perla, 1880 to 2025 0 300 600 900 1.2k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Percilla Perla

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 109 years in which either name was published, Perla for 89 years and Percilla for 20 years. The lead changed hands 17 times.

12 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Percilla Perla
Total US births 56720,836
Most in one year 221,109
Babies in 2025 under 5132
Estimated living today 41020,000
Median age today 6022
Peak year 19492003
Best rank 2,069th girls282nd girls
Rank in 2025 unranked1,587th
First recorded 19071918
Girls / boys 567 / 020,806 / 30

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Percillas alive today are over 60; half the Perlas are over 22. That is 38 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Percilla and Perla.