Humanverse

Phylis vs Phyliss

American parents have registered 3,342 Phylises since 1880, against 2,406 Phylisses. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Phylis against Phyliss, 1880 to 2025 0 30 60 90 120 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Phylis Phyliss

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 77 years in which either name was published, Phylis for 62 years and Phyliss for 15 years. The lead changed hands 20 times.

12 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Phylis Phyliss
Total US births 3,3422,406
Most in one year 10970
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 1,6001,200
Median age today 7472
Peak year 19491951
Best rank 847th girls1,109th girls
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 18961909
Girls / boys 3,342 / 02,406 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Phylises alive today are over 74; half the Phylisses are over 72. That is 2 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Phylis and Phyliss.