Humanverse

Rachael vs Rachell

American parents have registered 82,650 Rachaels since 1880, against 3,976 Rachells. But in 2025 it was Rachell that was commoner, 30 babies to 26.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Rachael against Rachell, 1880 to 2025 0 800 1.6k 2.4k 3.2k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Rachael Rachell

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 146 years in which either name was published, Rachael for 144 years and Rachell for 2 years. The lead changed hands once.

Side by side

  Rachael Rachell
Total US births 82,6503,976
Most in one year 3,03599
Babies in 2025 2630
Estimated living today 77,0003,700
Median age today 3738
Peak year 19901982
Best rank 111th girls1,284th girls
Rank in 2025 4,987th4,546th
First recorded 18801915
Girls / boys 82,469 / 1813,976 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Rachael Rachell
England and Wales 4,7083

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Rachael and Rachell.