Humanverse

Racheal vs Racquel

American parents have registered 10,520 Racheals since 1880, against 4,767 Racquels. Racheal is still ahead, with 6 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Racheal against Racquel, 1880 to 2025 0 100 200 300 400 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Racheal Racquel

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 115 years in which either name was published, Racheal for 104 years and Racquel for 11 years. The lead changed hands 6 times.

Side by side

  Racheal Racquel
Total US births 10,5204,767
Most in one year 388193
Babies in 2025 65
Estimated living today 9,7004,600
Median age today 3837
Peak year 19851970
Best rank 517th girls758th girls
Rank in 2025 13,208th14,942nd
First recorded 19101951
Girls / boys 10,520 / 04,762 / 5

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Racheal Racquel
England and Wales 2586

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Racheal and Racquel.