Humanverse

Rahmel vs Rahul

American parents have registered 3,332 Rahuls since 1880, against 732 Rahmels. But in 2025 it was Rahmel that was commoner, 10 babies to 8.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Rahmel against Rahul, 1880 to 2025 0 50 100 150 200 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Rahmel Rahul

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 58 years in which either name was published, Rahul for 53 years and Rahmel for 5 years. The lead changed hands 3 times.

Side by side

  Rahmel Rahul
Total US births 7323,332
Most in one year 24196
Babies in 2025 108
Estimated living today 7103,200
Median age today 2625
Peak year 19912000
Best rank 2,753rd boys818th boys
Rank in 2025 7,679th8,910th
First recorded 19751966
Girls / boys 0 / 7320 / 3,332

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Rahmel Rahul
England and Wales 31,247

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Rahmel and Rahul.