Ralph vs Ralston
American parents have registered 415,858 Ralphs since 1880, against 931 Ralstons. Ralph is still ahead, with 211 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Ralph Ralston
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Ralph has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1880 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 2015, when Ralph had 186 and Ralston had 15.
Side by side
| Ralph | Ralston | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 415,858 | 931 |
| Most in one year | 8,902 | 25 |
| Babies in 2025 | 211 | 7 |
| Estimated living today | 139,000 | 570 |
| Median age today | 68 | 29 |
| Peak year | 1921 | 1921 |
| Best rank | 23rd boys | 1,509th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 1,046th | 9,714th |
| First recorded | 1880 | 1910 |
| Girls / boys | 1,840 / 414,018 | 0 / 931 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Ralphs alive today are over 68; half the Ralstons are over 29. That is 39 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Ralph and Ralston.