Randal vs Rande
American parents have registered 29,324 Randals since 1880, against 616 Randes. Randal is still ahead, with 18 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Randal Rande
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Randal has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1909 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1950, when Randal had 490 and Rande had 40.
Side by side
| Randal | Rande | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 29,324 | 616 |
| Most in one year | 1,477 | 40 |
| Babies in 2025 | 18 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 23,000 | 460 |
| Median age today | 62 | 68 |
| Peak year | 1958 | 1956 |
| Best rank | 189th boys | 1,362nd boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 5,208th | unranked |
| First recorded | 1909 | 1944 |
| Girls / boys | 132 / 29,192 | 188 / 428 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Randes alive today are over 68; half the Randals are over 62. That is 6 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Randal and Rande.