Randell vs Randle
American parents have registered 10,159 Randells since 1880, against 2,936 Randles. Randell is still ahead, with 12 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Randell Randle
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 122 years in which either name was published, Randell for 102 years and Randle for 20 years. The lead changed hands 9 times.
Side by side
| Randell | Randle | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 10,159 | 2,936 |
| Most in one year | 321 | 84 |
| Babies in 2025 | 12 | 5 |
| Estimated living today | 7,700 | 1,900 |
| Median age today | 58 | 59 |
| Peak year | 1960 | 1954 |
| Best rank | 450th boys | 778th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 6,803rd | 12,008th |
| First recorded | 1912 | 1882 |
| Girls / boys | 148 / 10,011 | 7 / 2,929 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Where each one is strongest
- Randell Kentucky (5.7×), Oklahoma (3.4×), Tennessee (3.1×)
- Randle Mississippi (12.1×), Tennessee (8.9×), Texas (4.8×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Randell and Randle.