Humanverse

Rasheem vs Rashida

American parents have registered 3,005 Rashidas since 1880, against 1,317 Rasheems. Rashida is still ahead, with 6 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Rasheem against Rashida, 1880 to 2025 0 100 200 300 400 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Rasheem Rashida

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 58 years in which either name was published, Rashida for 34 years and Rasheem for 24 years. The lead changed hands 12 times.

8 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Rasheem Rashida
Total US births 1,3173,005
Most in one year 51338
Babies in 2025 under 56
Estimated living today 1,3002,900
Median age today 3444
Peak year 19911977
Best rank 1,632nd boys535th girls
Rank in 2025 unranked13,208th
First recorded 19711964
Girls / boys 0 / 1,3172,999 / 6

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Rashidas alive today are over 44; half the Rasheems are over 34. That is 10 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Rasheem and Rashida.