Rashell vs Rashida
American parents have registered 3,005 Rashidas since 1880, against 1,319 Rashells. But in 2025 it was Rashell that was commoner, 30 babies to 6.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Rashell Rashida
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 66 years in which either name was published, Rashell for 38 years and Rashida for 28 years. The lead changed hands 6 times.
Side by side
| Rashell | Rashida | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 1,319 | 3,005 |
| Most in one year | 44 | 338 |
| Babies in 2025 | 30 | 6 |
| Estimated living today | 1,300 | 2,900 |
| Median age today | 34 | 44 |
| Peak year | 1990 | 1977 |
| Best rank | 2,640th girls | 535th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 4,546th | 13,208th |
| First recorded | 1958 | 1964 |
| Girls / boys | 1,319 / 0 | 2,999 / 6 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Rashidas alive today are over 44; half the Rashells are over 34. That is 10 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Rashell California (6.3×), New York (1.9×)
- Rashida the District of Columbia (10.5×), New York (3.3×), New Jersey (2.1×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Rashell and Rashida.