Humanverse

Raylynn vs Rayne

American parents have registered 9,380 Raynes since 1880, against 3,889 Raylynns. Rayne is still ahead, with 368 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Raylynn against Rayne, 1880 to 2025 0 125 250 375 500 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Raylynn Rayne

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 75 years in which either name was published, Rayne for 74 years and Raylynn for 1 year. The lead changed hands 2 times.

Side by side

  Raylynn Rayne
Total US births 3,8899,380
Most in one year 257435
Babies in 2025 182368
Estimated living today 3,9009,300
Median age today 912
Peak year 20172019
Best rank 1,036th girls733rd girls
Rank in 2025 1,272nd904th
First recorded 19641947
Girls / boys 3,827 / 628,034 / 1,346

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Raynes alive today are over 12; half the Raylynns are over 9. That is 3 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Raylynn and Rayne.