Humanverse

Reana vs Reanna

American parents have registered 5,580 Reannas since 1880, against 676 Reanas. Reanna is still ahead, with 10 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Reana against Reanna, 1880 to 2025 0 80 160 240 320 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Reana Reanna

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 63 years in which either name was published, Reanna for 55 years and Reana for 8 years. The lead changed hands 6 times.

Side by side

  Reana Reanna
Total US births 6765,580
Most in one year 40273
Babies in 2025 under 510
Estimated living today 6605,500
Median age today 2827
Peak year 20011998
Best rank 3,368th girls786th girls
Rank in 2025 unranked9,457th
First recorded 19541948
Girls / boys 676 / 05,580 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Reana Reanna
England and Wales 8544

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Reana and Reanna.