Humanverse

Regena vs Regenia

American parents have registered 2,730 Regenas since 1880, against 2,626 Regenias. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Regena against Regenia, 1880 to 2025 0 40 80 120 160 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Regena Regenia

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 87 years in which either name was published, Regena for 57 years and Regenia for 30 years. The lead changed hands 23 times.

14 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Regena Regenia
Total US births 2,7302,626
Most in one year 85125
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 1,9001,900
Median age today 6266
Peak year 19481948
Best rank 939th girls764th girls
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 19041890
Girls / boys 2,730 / 02,626 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Regenias alive today are over 66; half the Regenas are over 62. That is 4 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Regena and Regenia.