Humanverse

Remmington vs Remo

American parents have registered 1,013 Remos since 1880, against 705 Remmingtons. But in 2025 it was Remmington that was commoner, 28 babies to 5.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Remmington against Remo, 1880 to 2025 0 15 30 45 60 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Remmington Remo

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 97 years in which either name was published, Remo for 71 years and Remmington for 26 years. The lead changed hands 9 times.

Side by side

  Remmington Remo
Total US births 7051,013
Most in one year 5432
Babies in 2025 285
Estimated living today 700440
Median age today 849
Peak year 20201932
Best rank 3,418th boys1,198th boys
Rank in 2025 5,608th12,008th
First recorded 19841913
Girls / boys 278 / 4270 / 1,013

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Remos alive today are over 49; half the Remmingtons are over 8. That is 41 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Remmington and Remo.