Humanverse

Rena vs Renell

American parents have registered 39,247 Renas since 1880, against 707 Renells. Rena is still ahead, with 75 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Rena against Renell, 1880 to 2025 0 150 300 450 600 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Rena Renell

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Rena has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1880 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.

The closest they came was 1992, when Rena had 150 and Renell had 15.

Side by side

  Rena Renell
Total US births 39,247707
Most in one year 57830
Babies in 2025 75under 5
Estimated living today 19,000610
Median age today 5857
Peak year 19621965
Best rank 400th girls2,154th girls
Rank in 2025 2,387thunranked
First recorded 18801924
Girls / boys 39,124 / 123553 / 154

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Rena Renell
England and Wales 13662

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Rena and Renell.