Rhodes vs Rhonda

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Rhodes Rhonda

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 112 years in which either name was published, Rhonda for 92 years and Rhodes for 20 years. The lead changed hands 7 times.

• 1910–1914 Rhonda ahead
• 1915–1916 Rhodes ahead
• 1917–1919 Rhonda ahead
• 1920–1921 Rhodes ahead
• 1922–1925 Rhonda ahead
• 1926–1927 Rhodes ahead
• 1928–2011 Rhonda ahead
• 2012–2025 Rhodes ahead

Side by side

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Rhondas alive today are over 61; half the Rhodeses are over 2. That is 59 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

• Rhodes Tennessee (2.8×), Georgia (2.6×), Colorado (2.4×)
• Rhonda Kentucky (1.7×), Oklahoma (1.6×), Louisiana (1.6×)

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

• Rhodes vs Rhoda
• Rhodes vs Rhona
• Rhonda vs Rhoda
• Rhonda vs Rhona