Richardson vs Rickey
American parents have registered 62,391 Rickeys since 1880, against 669 Richardsons. Rickey is still ahead, with 45 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Richardson Rickey
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 103 years in which either name was published, Rickey for 98 years and Richardson for 5 years. The lead changed hands 3 times.
- 1919–1923 Richardson ahead
- 1924–1930 Rickey ahead
- 1931–1932 Richardson ahead
- 1933–2025 Rickey ahead
Side by side
| Richardson | Rickey | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 669 | 62,391 |
| Most in one year | 16 | 3,818 |
| Babies in 2025 | 10 | 45 |
| Estimated living today | 560 | 48,000 |
| Median age today | 27 | 64 |
| Peak year | 2000 | 1958 |
| Best rank | 4,573rd boys | 106th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 7,679th | 2,798th |
| First recorded | 1919 | 1924 |
| Girls / boys | 0 / 669 | 674 / 61,717 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Rickeys alive today are over 64; half the Richardsons are over 27. That is 37 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Richardson and Rickey.