Humanverse

Ridge vs Ridley

American parents have registered 7,911 Ridges since 1880, against 2,892 Ridleys. Ridge is still ahead, with 571 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Ridge against Ridley, 1880 to 2025 0 150 300 450 600 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Ridge Ridley

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 68 years in which either name was published, Ridge for 45 years and Ridley for 23 years. The lead changed hands 9 times.

Side by side

  Ridge Ridley
Total US births 7,9112,892
Most in one year 599213
Babies in 2025 571166
Estimated living today 7,8002,800
Median age today 77
Peak year 20232021
Best rank 505th boys1,750th boys
Rank in 2025 529th2,077th
First recorded 19481915
Girls / boys 18 / 7,8931,364 / 1,528

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Ridge Ridley
France 9555

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Ridge and Ridley.