Humanverse

Rin vs Ringo

American parents have registered 516 Rins since 1880, against 253 Ringos. Rin is still ahead, with 65 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Rin against Ringo, 1880 to 2025 0 20 40 60 80 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Rin Ringo

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 41 years in which either name was published, Rin for 22 years and Ringo for 19 years. The lead changed hands 5 times.

Side by side

  Rin Ringo
Total US births 516253
Most in one year 6518
Babies in 2025 658
Estimated living today 510240
Median age today 539
Peak year 20251965
Best rank 3,577th girls1,856th boys
Rank in 2025 3,577th8,910th
First recorded 19831964
Girls / boys 419 / 970 / 253

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Ringos alive today are over 39; half the Rins are over 5. That is 34 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Rin Ringo
France 10350
England and Wales 93

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Rin and Ringo.