Riva vs Rivers

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Riva Rivers

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 113 years in which either name was published, Rivers for 57 years and Riva for 56 years. The lead changed hands 22 times.

• 1910–1939 Rivers ahead, apart from 2 short spells
• 1950–1994 Riva ahead
• 1999–2025 Rivers ahead

18 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Rivas alive today are over 29; half the Riverses are over 11. That is 18 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

• Riva New York (9.0×), California (1.7×)
• Rivers Mississippi (15.3×), South Carolina (15.3×), Louisiana (5.7×)

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

• Riva vs River
• Riva vs Rivka
• Riva vs Rivky
• Riva vs Rivkah
• Riva vs Riverlynn
• Rivers vs River
• Rivers vs Rivka
• Rivers vs Rivky