Ronnal vs Ronny
American parents have registered 15,045 Ronnys since 1880, against 33 Ronnals. Ronny is still ahead, with 34 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Ronnal Ronny
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Ronny has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1927 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1945, when Ronnal had 6 and Ronny had 273.
Side by side
| Ronnal | Ronny | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 33 | 15,045 |
| Most in one year | 6 | 438 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 34 |
| Estimated living today | 20 | 11,000 |
| Median age today | 76 | 59 |
| Peak year | 1945 | 1947 |
| Best rank | 2,996th boys | 332nd boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 3,379th |
| First recorded | 1945 | 1927 |
| Girls / boys | 0 / 33 | 478 / 14,567 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Ronnals alive today are over 76; half the Ronnys are over 59. That is 17 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Ronnal and Ronny.