Sanford vs Santhiago
American parents have registered 15,044 Sanfords since 1880, against 598 Santhiagos. But in 2025 it was Santhiago that was commoner, 70 babies to 12.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Sanford Santhiago
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 146 years in which either name was published, Sanford for 133 years and Santhiago for 13 years. The lead changed hands once.
Side by side
| Sanford | Santhiago | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 15,044 | 598 |
| Most in one year | 315 | 70 |
| Babies in 2025 | 12 | 70 |
| Estimated living today | 5,500 | 590 |
| Median age today | 67 | 5 |
| Peak year | 1929 | 2025 |
| Best rank | 311th boys | 2,091st boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 6,803rd | 2,091st |
| First recorded | 1880 | 2009 |
| Girls / boys | 0 / 15,044 | 0 / 598 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Sanfords alive today are over 67; half the Santhiagos are over 5. That is 62 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Sanford and Santhiago.