Saxon vs Saxton
American parents have registered 1,737 Saxons since 1880, against 699 Saxtons. Saxon is still ahead, with 39 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Saxon Saxton
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 55 years in which either name was published, Saxon for 54 years and Saxton for 1 year. The lead changed hands 2 times.
Side by side
| Saxon | Saxton | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 1,737 | 699 |
| Most in one year | 55 | 30 |
| Babies in 2025 | 39 | 19 |
| Estimated living today | 1,700 | 690 |
| Median age today | 18 | 14 |
| Peak year | 2021 | 2017 |
| Best rank | 2,523rd boys | 3,586th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 3,089th | 5,045th |
| First recorded | 1914 | 1976 |
| Girls / boys | 166 / 1,571 | 0 / 699 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Saxons alive today are over 18; half the Saxtons are over 14. That is 4 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Saxon and Saxton.