Shira vs Shirleyann
American parents have registered 5,815 Shiras since 1880, against 576 Shirleyanns. Shira is still ahead, with 79 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Shira Shirleyann
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 102 years in which either name was published, Shira for 75 years and Shirleyann for 27 years. The lead changed hands 3 times.
- 1923–1949 Shirleyann ahead
- 1950–1951 Shira ahead
- 1952 Shirleyann ahead
- 1953–2025 Shira ahead
Side by side
| Shira | Shirleyann | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 5,815 | 576 |
| Most in one year | 159 | 59 |
| Babies in 2025 | 79 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 5,600 | 260 |
| Median age today | 28 | 79 |
| Peak year | 2009 | 1935 |
| Best rank | 1,463rd girls | 896th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 2,298th | unranked |
| First recorded | 1941 | 1923 |
| Girls / boys | 5,815 / 0 | 576 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Shirleyanns alive today are over 79; half the Shiras are over 28. That is 51 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Shira New York (5.8×), New Jersey (4.3×), Maryland (3.9×)
- Shirleyann Pennsylvania (8.2×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Shira and Shirleyann.