Tige vs Tiger
American parents have registered 1,310 Tigers since 1880, against 333 Tiges. Tiger is still ahead, with 30 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Tige Tiger
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 50 years in which either name was published, Tiger for 37 years and Tige for 13 years. The lead changed hands 4 times.
Side by side
| Tige | Tiger | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 333 | 1,310 |
| Most in one year | 41 | 130 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 30 |
| Estimated living today | 300 | 1,300 |
| Median age today | 52 | 16 |
| Peak year | 1972 | 2010 |
| Best rank | 1,307th boys | 1,316th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 3,658th |
| First recorded | 1969 | 1962 |
| Girls / boys | 0 / 333 | 62 / 1,248 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Tiges alive today are over 52; half the Tigers are over 16. That is 36 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Tige and Tiger.