Humanverse

Tremayne vs Treva

American parents have registered 9,675 Trevas since 1880, against 3,996 Tremaynes. But in 2025 it was Tremayne that was commoner, 13 babies to 6.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Tremayne against Treva, 1880 to 2025 0 50 100 150 200 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Tremayne Treva

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 138 years in which either name was published, Treva for 85 years and Tremayne for 53 years. The lead changed hands once.

Side by side

  Tremayne Treva
Total US births 3,9969,675
Most in one year 185174
Babies in 2025 136
Estimated living today 3,8005,200
Median age today 3762
Peak year 19751962
Best rank 607th boys786th girls
Rank in 2025 6,446th13,208th
First recorded 19671886
Girls / boys 39 / 3,9579,664 / 11

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Trevas alive today are over 62; half the Tremaynes are over 37. That is 25 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Tremayne and Treva.