Ulises vs Ulisses
American parents have registered 11,959 Uliseses since 1880, against 1,312 Ulisseses. Ulises is still ahead, with 213 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Ulises Ulisses
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Ulises has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1954 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1986, when Ulises had 57 and Ulisses had 22.
Side by side
| Ulises | Ulisses | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 11,959 | 1,312 |
| Most in one year | 487 | 68 |
| Babies in 2025 | 213 | 16 |
| Estimated living today | 12,000 | 1,300 |
| Median age today | 19 | 22 |
| Peak year | 2006 | 1999 |
| Best rank | 524th boys | 1,593rd boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 1,038th | 5,608th |
| First recorded | 1954 | 1971 |
| Girls / boys | 15 / 11,944 | 0 / 1,312 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Ulisseses alive today are over 22; half the Uliseses are over 19. That is 3 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Ulises California (4.4×), Nevada (4.1×), Arizona (3.9×)
- Ulisses California (6.4×), Texas (3.6×), Illinois (1.1×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Ulises and Ulisses.