Vander vs Vanesa
American parents have registered 6,544 Vanesas since 1880, against 1,828 Vanders. But in 2025 it was Vander that was commoner, 139 babies to 28.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Vander Vanesa
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 118 years in which either name was published, Vanesa for 60 years and Vander for 58 years. The lead changed hands 2 times.
Side by side
| Vander | Vanesa | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 1,828 | 6,544 |
| Most in one year | 139 | 271 |
| Babies in 2025 | 139 | 28 |
| Estimated living today | 1,500 | 6,400 |
| Median age today | 9 | 26 |
| Peak year | 2025 | 2002 |
| Best rank | 1,352nd boys | 850th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 1,352nd | 4,758th |
| First recorded | 1884 | 1953 |
| Girls / boys | 0 / 1,828 | 6,539 / 5 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Vanesas alive today are over 26; half the Vanders are over 9. That is 17 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Vander California (3.1×), Florida (3.0×), North Carolina (2.3×)
- Vanesa California (4.0×), Nevada (3.1×), Texas (2.3×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Vander and Vanesa.