Vearl vs Veatrice
American parents have registered 523 Vearls since 1880, against 450 Veatrices. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Vearl Veatrice
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 64 years in which either name was published, Veatrice for 33 years and Vearl for 31 years. The lead changed hands 20 times.
- 1896–1914 Veatrice ahead
- 1918–1946 Vearl ahead, apart from 4 short spells
- 1951–1991 Veatrice ahead, apart from one short spell
13 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.
Side by side
| Vearl | Veatrice | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 523 | 450 |
| Most in one year | 27 | 22 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 80 | 130 |
| Median age today | 80 | 69 |
| Peak year | 1923 | 1919 |
| Best rank | 1,644th boys | 1,745th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | unranked |
| First recorded | 1906 | 1896 |
| Girls / boys | 70 / 453 | 450 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Vearls alive today are over 80; half the Veatrices are over 69. That is 11 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Vearl and Veatrice.