Venita vs Venna
American parents have registered 5,708 Venitas since 1880, against 531 Vennas. But in 2025 it was Venna that was commoner, 9 babies to fewer than five.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Venita Venna
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 118 years in which either name was published, Venita for 99 years and Venna for 19 years. The lead changed hands 14 times.
12 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.
Side by side
| Venita | Venna | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 5,708 | 531 |
| Most in one year | 243 | 19 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 9 |
| Estimated living today | 3,500 | 220 |
| Median age today | 65 | 20 |
| Peak year | 1960 | 1921 |
| Best rank | 648th girls | 2,048th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 10,107th |
| First recorded | 1901 | 1900 |
| Girls / boys | 5,708 / 0 | 531 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Venitas alive today are over 65; half the Vennas are over 20. That is 45 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Venita and Venna.