Verna vs Verner
American parents have registered 69,638 Vernas since 1880, against 2,134 Verners. Verna is still ahead, with 44 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Verna Verner
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Verna has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1880 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1881, when Verna had 30 and Verner had 5.
Side by side
| Verna | Verner | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 69,638 | 2,134 |
| Most in one year | 1,885 | 79 |
| Babies in 2025 | 44 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 18,000 | 360 |
| Median age today | 72 | 72 |
| Peak year | 1918 | 1917 |
| Best rank | 125th girls | 744th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 3,459th | unranked |
| First recorded | 1880 | 1881 |
| Girls / boys | 69,113 / 525 | 171 / 1,963 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Where each one is strongest
- Verna North Dakota (4.2×), South Dakota (3.5×), Arkansas (2.7×)
- Verner Minnesota (18.0×), Georgia (3.7×), Illinois (3.3×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Verna and Verner.