Humanverse

Vernal vs Vernon

American parents have registered 148,389 Vernons since 1880, against 2,158 Vernals. Vernon is still ahead, with 133 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Vernal against Vernon, 1880 to 2025 0 800 1.6k 2.4k 3.2k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Vernal Vernon

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Vernon has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1880 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.

The closest they came was 1902, when Vernal had 15 and Vernon had 188.

Side by side

  Vernal Vernon
Total US births 2,158148,389
Most in one year 633,199
Babies in 2025 under 5133
Estimated living today 61056,000
Median age today 6864
Peak year 19161920
Best rank 892nd boys65th boys
Rank in 2025 unranked1,382nd
First recorded 18921880
Girls / boys 370 / 1,7881,976 / 146,413

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Vernals alive today are over 68; half the Vernons are over 64. That is 4 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Vernal and Vernon.