Humanverse

Vernell vs Veryl

American parents have registered 10,468 Vernells since 1880, against 1,060 Veryls. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Vernell against Veryl, 1880 to 2025 0 60 120 180 240 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Vernell Veryl

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Vernell has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1897 to 2021. The lead has never changed hands.

The closest they came was 1912, when Vernell had 31 and Veryl had 26.

Side by side

  Vernell Veryl
Total US births 10,4681,060
Most in one year 21544
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 5,100180
Median age today 6878
Peak year 19241924
Best rank 543rd girls1,380th boys
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 18971904
Girls / boys 7,124 / 3,344374 / 686

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Veryls alive today are over 78; half the Vernells are over 68. That is 10 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Vernell and Veryl.