Humanverse

Viliami vs Vilma

American parents have registered 4,989 Vilmas since 1880, against 561 Viliamis. But in 2025 it was Viliami that was commoner, 18 babies to 14.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Viliami against Vilma, 1880 to 2025 0 60 120 180 240 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Viliami Vilma

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 124 years in which either name was published, Vilma for 118 years and Viliami for 6 years. The lead changed hands 7 times.

Side by side

  Viliami Vilma
Total US births 5614,989
Most in one year 21213
Babies in 2025 1814
Estimated living today 5502,800
Median age today 1852
Peak year 20101927
Best rank 4,517th boys477th girls
Rank in 2025 5,208th7,491st
First recorded 19801901
Girls / boys 0 / 5614,989 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Vilmas alive today are over 52; half the Viliamis are over 18. That is 34 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Viliami and Vilma.