Waldo vs Waleska
American parents have registered 5,722 Waldos since 1880, against 542 Waleskas. But in 2025 it was Waleska that was commoner, 8 babies to 6.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Waldo Waleska
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 145 years in which either name was published, Waldo for 131 years and Waleska for 14 years. The lead changed hands 15 times.
- 1880–2017 Waldo ahead, apart from 3 short spells
- 2018–2025 Waleska ahead, apart from one short spell
10 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.
Side by side
| Waldo | Waleska | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 5,722 | 542 |
| Most in one year | 174 | 21 |
| Babies in 2025 | 6 | 8 |
| Estimated living today | 1,500 | 520 |
| Median age today | 59 | 39 |
| Peak year | 1915 | 1981 |
| Best rank | 407th boys | 3,739th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 10,695th | 10,917th |
| First recorded | 1880 | 1962 |
| Girls / boys | 6 / 5,716 | 542 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Waldos alive today are over 59; half the Waleskas are over 39. That is 20 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Waldo and Waleska.