Humanverse

Wanna vs Wanza

American parents have registered 550 Wannas since 1880, against 418 Wanzas. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Wanna against Wanza, 1880 to 2025 0 10 20 30 40 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Wanna Wanza

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 55 years in which either name was published, Wanna for 36 years and Wanza for 19 years. The lead changed hands 16 times.

10 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Wanna Wanza
Total US births 550418
Most in one year 2233
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 170150
Median age today 7671
Peak year 19231915
Best rank 1,840th girls1,190th girls
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 19071915
Girls / boys 550 / 0418 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Wannas alive today are over 76; half the Wanzas are over 71. That is 5 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Wanna and Wanza.