Ward vs Warrick

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Ward Warrick

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 146 years in which either name was published, Ward for 138 years and Warrick for 8 years. The lead changed hands 4 times.

• 1880–1999 Ward ahead
• 2000 Warrick ahead
• 2001–2004 Ward ahead
• 2005–2011 Warrick ahead
• 2012–2025 Ward ahead

Side by side

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Wards alive today are over 63; half the Warricks are over 18. That is 45 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

• Ward vs Warren
• Ward vs Warner
• Ward vs Wardell
• Warrick vs Warren
• Warrick vs Warner
• Warrick vs Wardell